java - 關于多線程notify的問題
問題描述
public class WaitTest { static class ThreadA extends Thread {public ThreadA(String name){ super(name);}@Overridepublic void run() { synchronized (this){ System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+' call notify()'); //notify();//notify之后 要等到這個代碼塊結束之后才會把鎖讓出去,當然如果在notify之后又有wait,那就會主動把鎖讓出去 try { System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+' wait'); //wait(); //Thread.sleep(10000); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+' after notify'); }} } public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {ThreadA t1 =new ThreadA('t1');synchronized (t1){ System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+' start t1'); t1.start(); System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+' wait'); t1.wait();////System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+' notify'); // t1.notify(); System.out.println(t1.getName()); System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+' continue'); //t1.notify();} }}
照理來說 t1.wait() 應該會阻塞主線程,并沒有其他地方notify而去掉t1.start()之后,就能阻塞住了
這是什么道理?編譯器優化?還是synchronized代碼塊內如果不對monitor進行操作,結束主動notify??
問題解答
回答1:并不是優化其實,跟線程的執行有關的。在java doc中,public final synchronized void join(long millis)這個方法的注釋上面寫著一句話
<p> This implementation uses a loop of {@code this.wait} calls conditioned on {@code this.isAlive}. As a thread terminates the {@code this.notifyAll} method is invoked. It is recommended that applications not use {@code wait}, {@code notify}, or {@code notifyAll} on {@code Thread} instances.
看到加黑體,其實是線程結束之后調用的notifyAll導致wait蘇醒的。并不是什么虛擬機優化導致的。希望能解答你的困惑
相關文章:
1. javascript - immutable配合react提升性能?2. javascript - sublime快鍵鍵問題3. Apache 已經把網站根目錄的改為allow from all了,但是服務器還是不能訪問?4. vue.js - Vue 如何像Angular.js watch 一樣監聽數據變化5. css - 寫頁面遇到個布局問題,求大佬們幫解答,在線等,急!~6. javascript - nodejs關于進程間發送句柄的一點疑問7. 配置Apache時,添加對PHP的支持時語法錯誤8. 實現bing搜索工具urlAPI提交9. phpstudy8.1支持win11系統嗎?10. javascript - 移動端上不能實現拖拽布局嗎?

網公網安備